Scientific Discourse - TOEFL Reading Practice Test Paper with Answer Key

The TOEFL Reading Section is a critical element of the TOEFL exam, evaluating an individual's capacity to comprehend and analyze written English content. It comprises a passage followed by a set of questions designed to assess various reading skills. 

Engaging in practice tests can significantly enhance preparation for this section of the exam. These tests enable test-takers to become familiar with the types of passages and questions they will face. 

Looking to assess your performance in the TOEFL Reading Section? Start your preparation with this practice test on the topic "Scientific Discourse" and observe your progress!

Reading Instructions

• You have 15 minutes to read the following passage and answer all 10 questions related to it.  
• Most questions are worth 1 point, but the last question is worth more. The directions indicate how many points you will receive for that specific question. 
• The specific section/paragraphs have been provided again with the question for ease of understanding and quick solution.
• Some questions include a word or phrase that is highlighted in the question as well as in the paragraph for quick reference.

Science holds significant importance in pinpointing issues concerning the operation and decline of natural systems, especially when influenced by external factors. Consequently, scientific discoveries influence the formulation of policies aimed at safeguarding these systems as needed. Politicians often seek the expertise of scientists to furnish evidence for making policies that are scientifically robust or, at the very least, scientifically defensible.

Challenges arise due to frequent disputes among experts regarding the methods used for data collection and interpretation. An illustration of this is evident in the initial scientific observation of an ozone layer hole by the British Antarctic Survey. Initially met with skepticism by the scientific community, this observation faced doubt because the British Antarctic Survey was not yet considered an established scientific entity. Additionally, there was a prevailing belief that satellites would have detected any ozone depletion if it was indeed happening. It wasn't until the methodology of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center underwent scrutiny that it became evident that certain data had been overlooked.

Regarding the latter point, conflicts among scientists can emerge when data analysis seems to favor one policy over another. In 1991, the World Resource Institute (WRI) released estimates of greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for several countries, including India. This report drew criticism from Indian scientists who contended that certain crucial factors were overlooked, resulting in inflated emission values. The WRI faced accusations of unfairly attributing global warming to less economically developed nations, a stance that, if embraced, could hinder industrialization efforts and perpetuate, or even exacerbate, economic disparities. 

The scientific community widely acknowledges documented issues concerning the scientific method. It is accepted that even if scientists adhere consistently to their procedures, results obtained under different conditions can significantly differ. Various factors impact research, including laboratory organization, the influence of existing theories, financial limitations, and the peer review process. As a result, scientists tend to view themselves not as arbiters of universal truths but as revealers of trends or tendencies. 

However, two opposing factors challenge this notion. Firstly, certain scientific institutions aspire to maintain their status as purveyors of absolute truth. Additionally, policymakers reinforce this expectation by seeking definitive scientific validation to justify their policy decisions. According to several authors who have documented this phenomenon, decision-makers often do not strive to acquire all available information on an issue. Instead, they selectively choose the information that aligns with their objectives, a practice referred to as 'half-knowledge'. Instances of downplaying transboundary concerns such as water provision and pollution serve as illustrations. While politicians cannot ignore widely acknowledged data within scientific communities or across national borders, they exercise discretion, particularly in situations characterized by controversy and uncertainty. 

It's crucial to acknowledge that policies concerning scientific matters are significantly influenced by societal factors. These encompass the perceived importance of specific environmental issues, the level of trust in the institutions conducting research, and notably, the social status of those impacted by the concerns. Essentially, environmental challenges are often shaped by the cultural, economic, and political context prevailing within a society, suggesting a social construction of these issues. For instance, it's been proposed that contemporary 'post-materialist' Western societies prioritize 'quality,' including environmental quality, over 'quantity.' This proposition doesn't imply that individuals in low-income countries lack interest in environmental protection, as evidenced by movements like the Chipko movement in India. Rather, it underscores the wide variation in how different communities value resources. 

Ultimately, the dynamic nature of the 'issue of the day' is undeniable. Priorities fluctuate continuously, with certain issues gaining or losing urgency based on prevailing circumstances. Simultaneously, new concerns emerge onto the political agenda. It's been observed that elevating the profile of a specific issue often requires the efforts of a 'policy entrepreneur' who invests time, energy, and financial resources into its promotion. Moreover, whether an issue garners attention from political, environmental, or media groups largely depends on its alignment with their respective agendas, as well as their budgetary considerations.

Directions: Once you have read the passage, answer the following questions. 

Paragraph 1

Science holds significant importance in pinpointing issues concerning the operation and decline of natural systems, especially when influenced by external factors. Consequently, scientific discoveries influence the formulation of policies aimed at safeguarding these systems as needed. Politicians often seek the expertise of scientists to furnish evidence for making policies that are scientifically robust or, at the very least, scientifically defensible. 

1. In relation to paragraph 1, which of the subsequent research inquiries would be irrelevant to the article?
   1. Investigating the influence of climate change on weather patterns in Africa
   2. Examining the potential correlation between low-level radiation exposure and cancer risk
   3. Studying the effects of acid rain on species within a lake ecosystem
   4. Comparing the species composition in two distinct woodland areas 

Paragraph 2

Challenges arise due to frequent disputes among experts regarding the methods used for data collection and interpretation. An illustration of this is evident in the initial scientific observation of an ozone layer hole by the British Antarctic Survey. Initially met with skepticism by the scientific community, this observation faced doubt because the British Antarctic Survey was not yet considered an established scientific entity. Additionally, there was a prevailing belief that satellites would have detected any ozone depletion if it was indeed happening. It wasn't until the methodology of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center underwent scrutiny that it became evident that certain data had been overlooked.

1. What is the intent behind providing the example of ozone data in paragraph 2?
   1. To demonstrate the unreliability of data collection methods employed by NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
   2. To illustrate the impact of data collection methods and the credibility of scientists on the perception of data
   3. To argue against disregarding evidence originating from a non-established source
   4. To depict the disagreement between NASA and the British Antarctic Survey regarding the appropriate approach to gathering ozone data

Paragraph 3

Regarding the latter point, conflicts among scientists can emerge when data analysis seems to favor one policy over another. In 1991, the World Resource Institute (WRI) released estimates of greenhouse gas emissions and sinks for several countries, including India. This report drew criticism from Indian scientists who contended that certain crucial factors were overlooked, resulting in inflated emission values. The WRI faced accusations of unfairly attributing global warming to less economically developed nations, a stance that, if embraced, could hinder industrialization efforts and perpetuate, or even exacerbate, economic disparities. 

1. Paragraph 3 presents a disagreement regarding which of the following questions?
   1. Determining which country bore the greatest responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions.
   2. Examining the pollution attributed to multinational corporations in India.
   3. Disputing the interpretation and presentation of statistics.
   4. Identifying inaccurate data stemming from a poorly funded experiment. 

Paragraph 4

The scientific community widely acknowledges documented issues concerning the scientific method. It is accepted that even if scientists adhere consistently to their procedures, results obtained under different conditions can significantly differ. Various factors impact research, including laboratory organization, the influence of existing theories, financial limitations, and the peer review process. As a result, scientists tend to view themselves not as arbiters of universal truths but as revealers of trends or tendencies. 

1. Which sentence most effectively encapsulates the concepts conveyed in paragraph 4?
   1. Scientists acknowledge the limitations of their work in establishing irrefutable truths.
   2. Enhanced consistency among scientists could yield more dependable evidence.
   3. Differences in research methodologies frequently impact the validity of findings.
   4. Scientists allocate more time to documenting issues than to conducting research.

Paragraph 5

However, two opposing factors challenge this notion. Firstly, certain scientific institutions aspire to maintain their status as purveyors of absolute truth. Additionally, policymakers reinforce this expectation by seeking definitive scientific validation to justify their policy decisions. According to several authors who have documented this phenomenon, decision-makers often do not strive to acquire all available information on an issue. Instead, they selectively choose the information that aligns with their objectives, a practice referred to as 'half-knowledge'. Instances of downplaying transboundary concerns such as water provision and pollution serve as illustrations. While politicians cannot ignore widely acknowledged data within scientific communities or across national borders, they exercise discretion, particularly in situations characterized by controversy and uncertainty. 

1. In paragraph 5, the term 'this' pertains to
   1. the scientific method and its associated challenges.
   2. the notion that scientists cannot ascertain universal truths.
   3. the variability in scientific outcomes across different conditions.
   4. the compilation of factors influencing scientific research.

1. Why are 'transboundary concerns such as water provision and pollution' mentioned in paragraph 5?
   1. To exemplify instances where politicians disregard certain data.
   2. To exemplify instances where scientific institutions provide inaccurate information to uphold their status.
   3. To exemplify instances where politicians selectively gather data.
   4. To exemplify instances where policymakers demand scientific certainties from scientists, despite their absence.

1. What can be deduced about the Chipko movement?
   1. It was an illustration of the lack of interest in environmental protection among individuals in low-income countries.
   2. It was an illustration of varying valuations of a resource within a community.
   3. It was an illustration of environmental protection initiatives within a low-income community.
   4. It was an illustration of prioritizing quantity over quality within a low-income community.

Paragraph 7

Ultimately, the dynamic nature of the 'issue of the day' is undeniable. Priorities fluctuate continuously, with certain issues gaining or losing urgency based on prevailing circumstances. Simultaneously, new concerns emerge onto the political agenda. It's been observed that elevating the profile of a specific issue often requires the efforts of a 'policy entrepreneur' who invests time, energy, and financial resources into its promotion. Moreover, whether an issue garners attention from political, environmental, or media groups largely depends on its alignment with their respective agendas, as well as their budgetary considerations. 

1. Which of the subsequent assertions is NOT delineated in paragraph 7?
   1. The visibility of an issue in political or media realms hinges on the endorsement of a prominent figure.
   2. Politicians prioritize environmental issues solely if they stand to gain from them.
   3. Public attention to issues is contingent upon fervent advocacy by specific individuals.
   4. Issues might be disregarded if overshadowed by other significant events occurring concurrently. 

Paragraph 2

Challenges arise due to frequent disputes among experts regarding the methods used for data collection and interpretation. An illustration of this is evident in the initial scientific observation of an ozone layer hole by the British Antarctic Survey. (A) Initially met with skepticism by the scientific community, this observation faced doubt because the British Antarctic Survey was not yet considered an established scientific entity. (B) Additionally, there was a prevailing belief that satellites would have detected any ozone depletion if it was indeed happening. (C) It wasn't until the methodology of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center underwent scrutiny that it became evident that certain data had been overlooked. (D)

1. Directions: Look at the part of the passage that is displayed above. The letters (A), (B), (C), and (D) indicate where the following sentence could be added.
   
   This was because of the way their computers had been programmed to discard any readings which appeared anomalous.
   
   Where would the sentence best fit?
   1. Choice A
   2. Choice B
   3. Choice C
   4. Choice D

1. Instructions: Below is an introductory sentence for summarizing the passage. You need to choose three answer choices that represent the most significant ideas in the passage to complete the summary. Some answer choices are irrelevant or minor ideas not discussed in the passage. This question is worth 2 points.
   
   Scientific discoveries are crucial for identifying problems in natural systems and informing policies to protect them, often leading politicians to seek scientific evidence for their decisions.
   
   
   

   Answer Choices

   1. Politicians exhibit irresponsibility in selecting scientific research to justify their policies.
   2. Determining the extent to which scientific data reflects truth poses challenges.
   3. Experts often dismiss scientific research if it originates from an unestablished institute.
   4. Policy-makers cherry-pick scientific data to align with their political agendas.
   5. The dissemination of scientific research to the public is influenced by cultural, social, and economic factors.
   6. Scientific research standards in Western nations surpass those in low-income countries.

Answer Key with Explanation for TOEFL Reading Passage - Scientific Discourse

1. Answer: D

Explanation: The correct answer is D. Based on paragraph 1, the subsequent research inquiry that would be irrelevant to the article is D) Comparing the species composition in two distinct woodland areas. This choice is irrelevant because paragraph 1 discusses the importance of science in identifying and addressing issues related to natural systems, particularly when influenced by external factors. The research inquiries mentioned in choices A, B, and C are all directly related to understanding the impacts of external factors (climate change, low-level radiation, acid rain) on natural systems. However, comparing the species composition in two distinct woodland areas does not directly relate to identifying or addressing issues related to external factors affecting natural systems. Therefore, choice D would be considered irrelevant to the article's focus.

2. Answer: B

Explanation: The correct answer is Option B. The intent behind providing the example of ozone data in paragraph 2 is to illustrate the impact of data collection methods and the credibility of scientists on the perception of data. This choice is supported by the passage's discussion of disputes among experts regarding the methods used for data collection and interpretation, particularly regarding the initial scientific observation of an ozone layer hole by the British Antarctic Survey. The passage highlights how this observation faced skepticism initially because the British Antarctic Survey was not considered an established scientific entity, and there was a prevailing belief that satellites would have detected any ozone depletion if it was indeed happening. The example demonstrates how the credibility of the institution conducting the research and the methods used for data collection can influence the perception of scientific findings. Therefore, choice B best reflects the intent behind providing this example in paragraph 2.

3. Answer: A

Explanation: The correct answer is A. Paragraph 3 presents an instance of contention regarding determining which country bore the greatest responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions. This choice is supported by the passage's discussion of the World Resource Institute (WRI) releasing estimates of greenhouse gas emissions for several countries, including India. The paragraph describes how Indian scientists criticized the report, arguing that certain crucial factors were overlooked, leading to inflated emission values. The contention arises from the attribution of global warming to less economically developed nations, which could hinder industrialization efforts and perpetuate economic disparities. Therefore, choice A best reflects the instance of contention presented in paragraph 3.

4. Answer: C

Explanation: The correct answer is C. The sentence that most effectively encapsulates the concepts conveyed in paragraph 4 is - Differences in research methodologies frequently impact the validity of findings. This choice reflects the paragraph's discussion of the scientific community acknowledging issues concerning the scientific method, including the impact of variations in research methodologies on the validity of findings. The paragraph emphasizes that despite scientists' consistency in their procedures, results obtained under different conditions can significantly differ due to various factors influencing research. Therefore, choice C best summarizes the concepts presented in paragraph 4.

5. Answer: A

Explanation: The correct answer is A. In paragraph 5, the term 'this' pertains to the scientific method and its associated challenges. This choice is supported by the preceding sentence in paragraph 5, which discusses the scientific community acknowledging documented issues concerning the scientific method. The paragraph goes on to describe how scientists recognize that, despite adhering consistently to their procedures, results obtained under different conditions can significantly differ due to various factors influencing research. Therefore, choice A best reflects the meaning of 'this' in paragraph 5.

6. Answer: D

Explanation: The correct answer is D. The 'transboundary issues such as water provision and pollution' are mentioned in paragraph 5 to exemplify instances where policymakers demand scientific certainties from scientists, despite their absence. This choice is supported by the paragraph's discussion of policymakers selectively choosing information that aligns with their objectives, referred to as 'half-knowledge'. The mention of downplaying transboundary concerns such as water provision and pollution serves as an illustration of how politicians exercise discretion in using scientific data, particularly in situations characterized by controversy and uncertainty. Therefore, choice D best reflects the reason for mentioning transboundary issues in paragraph 5.

7. Answer: B

Explanation: The correct answer is Option B. It was an illustration of varying valuations of a resource within a community. The Chipko movement, which originated in India, involved local communities, particularly women, protesting against deforestation by hugging trees to prevent them from being cut down. This movement demonstrated the value placed on environmental conservation within the community, rather than indicating a lack of interest in environmental protection among individuals in low-income countries (choice A). It also reflected varying valuations of natural resources within the community, making choice B the most appropriate deduction. The movement was primarily an environmental protection initiative within a low-income community, not an illustration of prioritizing quantity over quality (choice D). Therefore, choice C is the most accurate inference.

8. Answer: B

Explanation: The assertion NOT delineated in paragraph 7 is Option B. Politicians prioritize environmental issues solely if they stand to gain from them. Paragraph 7 primarily discusses how the visibility of an issue in political or media realms depends on factors such as endorsement by prominent figures (choice A), fervent advocacy by specific individuals (choice C), and the possibility of issues being disregarded if overshadowed by other significant events (choice D). However, there is no explicit mention of politicians prioritizing environmental issues solely for personal gain. Therefore, choice B is the assertion not delineated in paragraph 7.

9. Answer: C

Explanation: The correct answer is C. The sentence "This was because of the way their computers had been programmed to discard any readings which appeared anomalous." would best fit Choice C. The sentence provides an explanation for why certain data had been overlooked in the initial scientific observation of the ozone layer hole by the British Antarctic Survey. This observation is mentioned in choice C, where it describes the scrutiny undergone by the methodology of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. Placing the sentence after choice C ensures that the reader understands the cause of the overlooked data immediately after learning about the scrutiny of the methodology. This enhances the coherence and logical flow of the passage. By adding the sentence after choice C, it clarifies the reason for the overlooked data, strengthening the argument presented in the paragraph regarding disputes over data collection and interpretation.

10. Answer: A, B, D

Explanation: The table is completed correctly below. 

Option A: This choice reflects a central theme of the passage, which discusses how politicians often rely on the selective use of scientific research to support their policies. The passage highlights instances where policymakers demand scientific certainties to legitimize their decisions, even though scientific certainties may not exist. This irresponsibility is evident in how politicians cherry-pick scientific data that aligns with their political agendas, as discussed in choice D.

Option B: This choice captures another significant idea presented in the passage. The passage discusses various challenges and limitations associated with scientific research, including disputes over data collection and interpretation, the variability of research outcomes under different conditions, and the acknowledgment within the scientific community that research cannot always establish incontrovertible truths.

Option D: This choice is crucial in summarizing the passage's discussion about the relationship between policymakers and scientific research. The passage illustrates how policymakers often selectively use scientific data to support their political objectives, rather than objectively considering all available evidence. This selective use of data undermines the integrity of the scientific process and can lead to biased policy-making.

Option C: While the passage discusses disputes among experts over data collection and interpretation, it does not specifically address experts dismissing research based on its origin from an unestablished institute. Instead, it focuses more on disagreements regarding methodologies and the credibility of scientific findings.

Option E: While the passage does mention societal factors influencing policies regarding scientific issues, such as the importance of specific environmental issues, trust in research institutions, and the social standing of affected individuals, it does not specifically discuss the dissemination of scientific research to the public. The emphasis is more on how policies are shaped by societal factors rather than the dissemination process itself.

Option F: The passage does not directly compare scientific research standards between Western nations and low-income countries. While it discusses issues related to the scientific method and challenges within the research process, it does not make specific comparisons between different regions' research standards. Therefore, this choice does not accurately represent a significant idea discussed in the passage.

What are your thoughts on the ‘Scientific Discourse’ Reading passage? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments and help your friends in their TOEFL journey and don’t forget to try out some more of our customized TOEFL practice tests to keep your preparation going!

Additional Reads: