Should Political Campaigns Be Funded by Public Money - TOEFL Writing for Academic Discussion

Participating in scholarly conversations is a vital skill tested in the TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion task. This section challenges you to evaluate a professor’s lecture and contribute thoughtful, well-supported arguments. Use this practice test to prepare effectively for the task. Let's begin your practice with our TOEFL Academic Discussion sample test on "Should Political Campaigns Be Funded by Public Money".

Writing Instructions

• You will read a discussion related to an academic topic in class where your classmates have written their opinions on the said topic.
• You have 10 minutes to prepare and write your personal opinion on the academic topic.
• Try to answer the question based on the discussion. You can also take ideas from the opinions posted by your classmates.
• There is no maximum word limit. However, an effective response should be a minimum of 100 words.
• Your response will be judged on the quality and clarity of your writing with well-supported reasons.

Instructions: Your professor is teaching a class on environmental science. Write a post responding to the professor's question. In your response, you should -

1. express and support your personal opinion,
2. make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.

An effective response will contain at least 100 words.

Professor: As we explore the topic of political campaign financing, I want to hear your thoughts on this question: Should political campaigns be funded by public money? This is a debated issue with arguments on both sides. On one hand, public funding could level the playing field and reduce the power of wealthy donors. On the other hand, it could be seen as an inappropriate use of taxpayer money. What do you think?

Emily: I believe that political campaigns should be funded by public money. This approach would help make sure that all candidates, regardless of their financial background, have an equal chance to present their ideas to the public. It would also reduce the power of wealthy donors and special interest groups, leading to a more fair election process. For example, in countries where public funding is used, there tends to be a wider range of candidates and viewpoints represented.

Oliver: While I understand Emily's view, I disagree. I think that using public money to fund political campaigns is an inappropriate use of taxpayer funds. There are many other pressing needs, such as healthcare, education, and roads, that require public funding. Also, private donations allow individuals to support candidates who align with their values and beliefs. For example, in the United States, private funding has enabled grassroots movements to gain support and bring about significant political change.

Wait! Let's learn more about the TOEFL Exam Pattern and Syllabus before checking out the sample answers to the Academic Discussion Writing task!

Sample Response for the Academic Discussion Writing Task on - Should Political Campaigns Be Funded by Public Money

We’ve included two sample responses for the Writing Academic Discussion Task—one illustrating a high-level response and the other a mid-level response. Reviewing these examples will help you understand the scoring criteria for each level and enhance your writing skills as a result.

High-level Response

I believe that political campaigns should be funded by public money. Emily makes a compelling argument about leveling the playing field and reducing the influence of wealthy donors and special interest groups. Public funding can ensure that all candidates, regardless of their financial background, have an equal opportunity to present their ideas to the electorate. This can lead to a more diverse range of candidates and viewpoints, enriching the democratic process. For instance, countries that utilize public funding for campaigns often see a broader spectrum of political representation, which can lead to more comprehensive and inclusive policy discussions.

However, I also understand Oliver's concerns about the allocation of taxpayer money. While it is true that there are many pressing needs such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, the integrity of the democratic process is also crucial. Ensuring fair and equitable elections can have long-term benefits for society, including more representative governance and policies that better reflect the will of the people. Additionally, public funding can be structured in a way that is cost-effective and transparent, ensuring that taxpayer money is used responsibly.

To address both perspectives, a hybrid approach could be considered. Public funding could be provided to ensure a baseline level of support for all candidates, while still allowing for private donations within regulated limits.

Rater’s Comment

This response merits a high score due to its clear and well-developed argument. The writer effectively addresses the prompt by presenting a balanced view on the issue of public funding for political campaigns. The response is well-organized, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The first paragraph discusses the benefits of public funding, such as leveling the playing field and reducing the influence of wealthy donors. The second paragraph acknowledges the concerns about the allocation of taxpayer money and emphasizes the importance of a fair democratic process. The writer also proposes a hybrid approach that combines public funding with regulated private contributions. The language is formal and appropriate for an academic discussion, and the response is free from major grammatical errors. Overall, the writer provides a compelling and coherent argument that contributes meaningfully to the discussion.

Mid-level Response

I agree with Emily that political campaigns should be funded by public money. It would create a more balanced playing field where all candidates, regardless of financial backing, can equally present their views to the public. This can reduce the influence of wealthy donors who often sway elections in favor of candidates who can gather large sums of money. However, I also see Oliver’s point that there are other areas, like healthcare and education, that need public funding. But I think ensuring fair elections is also crucial for a healthy democracy.

Rater’s Comment

This response presents a clear argument in favor of public funding for political campaigns, aligning with Emily's points, but it also acknowledges the opposing viewpoint raised by Oliver. The ideas are explained well, though the response could benefit from more specific examples or elaboration on how public funding could impact election fairness. The grammar and structure are solid, though more depth would improve the analysis.

Strategies for Taking the Academic Discussion Writing Task on - Should Political Campaigns Be Funded by Public Money

It's time to examine the tips our experts have developed and put them to work as we practice with TOEFL Writing mock tests. Check the following strategies for taking an academic discussion task.

• Carefully read the professor's questions and responses from other students. Identify key arguments presented on both sides of the debate.

• Note the advantages and the disadvantages. This will help you address the prompt fully.

• Decide whether you agree more with the benefits or the drawbacks. Make sure your stance is clear from the beginning and supported throughout your response.

• A well-rounded response addresses the opposing viewpoint. While supporting your own position, briefly explain why the drawbacks or opposing side may still be valid but less significant.

Feeling confident after exploring the sample response and writing strategies? Put your knowledge into practice! All the best!

Also Read:

• Important Discoveries and Inventions - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion
• Scientific Research - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion
• Tech-Enhanced Learning - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion
• Globalisation - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion