logo
Contact us
zoom image
Home Practice Tests TOEFL Writing Practice Tests

Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Practice Test

Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases - TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Practice Test

alt image

"Prepare for the TOEFL Writing Academic Discussion Section with a practice test on 'Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam. "

In the TOEFL iBT® exam, the writing test assesses a candidate's ability to write academically, where they are required to successfully integrate the knowledge into their work and organize the ideas coherently. The two Writing Sections, such as Academic Discussion and Integrated Writing, make up the Writing Section.

In this practice test on 'Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases', you will hear a lecture on a certain subject from a professor in the Academic Discussion activity. After that, you'll take part in a conversation where you'll have to voice your opinion and provide solid justification for it

The best method to get ready for this part of the test is to practice on tests specifically made for the Academic Discussion format. Let's start your study with our "Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases"-themed TOEFL Academic Discussion practice exam.

Writing Instructions:

  • You will read a discussion related to an academic topic in class where your classmates have written their opinions on the said topic.
  • You have 10 minutes to prepare and write your personal opinion on the academic topic. 
  • Try to answer the question based on the discussion. You can also take ideas from the opinions posted by your classmates.
  • There is no maximum word limit. However, an effective response should be a minimum of 100 words.
  • Your response will be judged on the quality and clarity of your writing with well-supported reasons.

Instruction: Your professor is teaching a class on bioethics. Write a post responding to the professors question. In your response, you should

  1. express and support your personal opinion
  2. make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.

An effective response will contain at least 100 words. You have ten minutes to write.

Professor: Today, were going to discuss the moral questions of gene editing. Mainly, I want to know your thoughts on this question: Should gene editing be used to prevent genetic diseases? Consider the possible benefits and risks, and share your perspective on whether this technology should be embraced or approached with caution.

Sophie: I think gene editing should be used to prevent genetic diseases. This technology can eliminate serious genetic problems, improving the quality of life for many people. For example, conditions like cystic fibrosis and Huntington's disease could be wiped out. Although there are moral concerns, strict rules can ensure responsible use. Watching can ensure ethical use.

George: Although the possible benefits of gene editing are big, I think we should approach this technology with caution. There are many unknowns and possible risks. These include unexpected genetic results and moral problems around "designer babies." We need more research and strong moral guidelines before widely using gene editing to prevent genetic diseases. The long-term impacts are still uncertain.

Response Time: 10 minutes

Before delving into sample responses, let us examine the parameters of a strong TOEFL score!

Sample Response for the Academic Discussion Writing Task on Should Genetic Editing Be Used to Prevent Inherited Diseases

Below are the two responses for the Academic Discussion Writing question where one of them showcases a mid-level proficiency while the other exhibits a high level of skills. Through examining the distinctions, you will acquire valuable insights into the components that lead to attaining an exceptional score in the Writing section.

Score 3 Response

I think gene editing should be used to prevent genetic diseases, but we need to be careful. Sophie is right that it can help get rid of diseases like cystic fibrosis, it can improve many lives. But George also has a point about the risks. We dont know what could happen in the long run, and there are moral issues like "designer babies." We should do more research and have strong rules to make sure its used the right way. This way, we can get the benefits without too many risks. (Word Count - 91)

Rater’s Comment

This response is adequate but lacks the depth and clarity of a higher-level response. The student addresses both Sophies and Georges points, showing an understanding of the benefits and risks of gene editing. However, the argument is not as well-developed or nuanced. The response contains a comma splice in the sentence, "Sophie is right that it can help get rid of diseases like cystic fibrosis, it can improve many lives." Additionally, there is an incorrect tense usage in "We dont know what could happen in the long run," which should be "We dont know what will happen in the long run." These grammatical errors, while not severely hindering comprehension, do detract from the overall quality. The response is generally comprehensible and relevant but lacks the sophistication and coherence needed for a higher score.

Score 5 Response

While gene editing holds immense potential for preventing genetic diseases, I believe it should be approached with caution. George makes a valid point about the unknown risks and ethical dilemmas, such as the possibility of "designer babies." The technology is still in its infancy, and we do not fully understand the long-term consequences. For instance, unintended genetic mutations could arise, leading to new health issues. Sophies optimism about eliminating diseases like cystic fibrosis is compelling, but we must ensure that the benefits outweigh the risks. Strict regulations and comprehensive research are essential to navigate the ethical landscape and ensure responsible use. Balancing innovation with caution will help us harness the benefits of gene editing while minimizing potential harms. (Word count - 118 words)

Rater’s Comment

This response merits a high score due to its clear, well-structured argument and engagement with the ongoing discussion. The student acknowledges both Sophies and Georges perspectives, thereby demonstrating an understanding of the complexity of the issue. The response effectively balances the potential benefits of gene editing, such as eliminating diseases like cystic fibrosis, with the risks, including unintended genetic mutations and ethical concerns about "designer babies." The student emphasizes the need for strict regulations and comprehensive research, which adds depth to the argument. The language is formal and appropriate for an academic setting, and the response is free from grammatical errors. Overall, the response is coherent, logical, and contributes meaningfully to the discussion.

Strategies for Taking the Academic Discussion Writing Task 

The TOEFL Academic Discussion Writing Task may seem difficult and can cause you to become nervous. But don't feel scared! You can do this task effectively by incorporating a few vital strategies to ace your proficiency in academic writing.

    • It is important to have a detailed examination of the question which is necessary to comprehend both the main idea and the setting for that specific question. It is necessary to consider the provided guidelines, such as providing a response that addresses all relevant angles.
    • Finding the key arguments is made simpler by dissecting the question into its constituent parts. It's critical to successfully manage each component at the same time while organising the response.
    • Before attempting to write the answer, always plan and come up with ideas and use them as examples so that you can showcase a range of perspectives.
    • Making an outline ensures that the response is cohesive and the concepts are well-organized.
    • Giving evidence or statistics to support assertions and points of view demonstrates your grasp of the subject.
    • Avoid using any slang or informal language; instead, stick to professional language and academic terminologies, paying close attention to grammar and punctuation.

Finally, it's time for you to shine! Attempt the practice question and share your response in the comments! 

Our TOEFL experts are more than willing to provide valuable feedback which would help you achieve your target score!  Let's improve your writing skills together!

Additional Reads:

Featured Articles

article
Working from Home vs Office - TOEFL Speaking Practice Test (Independent)

Prepare for the TOEFL Independent Speaking section with the practice test on 'Working from Home vs Office' along with sample answers to score higher.

December 26, 2024
article
Urban vs Rural Living - TOEFL Speaking Practice Test (Independent)

Prepare for the TOEFL Independent Speaking section with the practice test on 'Urban vs Rural Living' along with sample answers to score higher.

December 26, 2024
article
Traditional vs Online Shopping - TOEFL Speaking Practice Test (Independent)

Prepare for the TOEFL Independent Speaking section with the practice test on 'Traditional vs Online Shopping' along with sample answers to score higher.

December 26, 2024
article
Traditional vs Modern Parenting - TOEFL Speaking Practice Test (Independent)

Prepare for the TOEFL Independent Speaking section with the practice test on 'Traditional vs Modern Parenting' along with sample answers to score higher.

December 26, 2024