logo
zoom image
Home Practice Tests TOEFL Writing Practice Tests

Should Public Transportation Be Free - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

Should Public Transportation Be Free - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

alt image

In the TOEFL iBT®exam, the test takers are evaluated on various abilities, particularly on their communication skills. With the practice test on 'Should Public Transportation Be Free', candidates can level up their preparation as the Writing Section is one of the significant ones.

This Writing Integrated practice test aims to enhance your writing abilities. It aims to assist you in understanding task instructions, structuring responses effectively, and enhancing your performance in the TOEFL Writing segment. So, let's start your journey towards attaining your desired TOEFL score!

Writing Instructions:

  • You'll read a passage and listen to a lecture on an academic topic.
  • You may take notes while listening to aid comprehension.
  • Then you will write a response to a question that asks you about the lecture you heard.
  • Answer the question comprehensively using information from the lecture. Avoid expressing personal opinions in the response.
  • There is no strict word limit. However, an effective response is considered to be within 150 to 225 words.
  • Your response will be assessed based on writing quality, content accuracy, and completeness.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Should Public Transportation Be Free

The idea of making public transportation free has gained support as a way to tackle various urban problems. One of the main benefits is the potential to reduce traffic congestion. If fares are removed, more people might use public transportation. This would reduce the number of cars on the road. This shift could lead to fewer vehicles on the road, easing traffic jams and cutting down commute times. Tallinn in Estonia made public transport free and saw less traffic.

Another advantage is the positive impact on the environment. With fewer cars on the road, there would be a drop in greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution. Public transportation uses less energy than cars. Using it more could make the air cleaner and improve health. This is especially important in urban areas where air quality is often a major issue. Free public transportation can also support social fairness. Transportation costs can be a big load for low-income individuals and families. By making public transit free, cities can ensure that everyone has access to important services, job opportunities, and schools. This can help bridge the gap between different economic groups and create a more inclusive society.

Now play the audio.

Question

Provide a brief summary on the lecture's arguments and also highlight their relevance on the claims provided in the reading passage. State your opinion.

Response Time: 20 minutes

Transcript of the Audio of the Lecture on Should Public Transportation Be Free

Professor: While the idea of free public transportation sounds appealing, there are several practical issues to consider. For one, the cost of maintaining and operating public transit systems is large. Without fare income, cities need other funds. They might raise taxes. This could place a financial strain on residents, especially those who do not use public transportation.

The environmental benefits are also not guaranteed. If public transportation becomes overcrowded due to increased usage, it could lead to a decline in service quality. People might go back to using their cars if they find public transit inconsistent or uncomfortable, canceling out any potential environmental gains. Also, more use could damage transit systems. This would increase maintenance costs and cause more service problems.

Social fairness is another complex issue. While free public transportation could help low-income individuals, it might also lead to unintended consequences. For example, without fare income, there might be less money to improve transit services. This might unfairly affect areas with poor transit access. Moreover, the increased demand could strain existing services, making it harder for those who rely on public transit the most to get where they need to go.

Curious about what a good TOEFL score looks like? Check it out first, then explore the Integrated Writing sample answers!

Sample Responses for the Integrated Writing Task on Should Public Transportation Be Free

A comprehensive analysis of various responses is provided below, enabling you to identify areas requiring improvement to achieve your target score.

High-Level Response

The lecture challenges the reading's positive view on making public transportation free. The professor argues that the cost of maintaining and operating public transit systems is significant. Without fare income, cities would need to find alternative funding, possibly through higher taxes. This could place a financial burden on residents, especially those who do not use public transportation. This contradicts the reading's claim that free public transportation would be beneficial for all.

The professor also questions the environmental benefits of free public transportation. Increased usage could lead to overcrowding and a decline in service quality, causing people to revert to using their cars. This would negate any potential environmental gains. Additionally, more usage could damage transit systems, increasing maintenance costs and causing more service problems. This challenges the reading's assertion that free public transportation would improve air quality and health.

Lastly, the professor highlights the complexities of social fairness. While free public transportation could help low-income individuals, it might also lead to unintended consequences. Without fare income, there might be less money to improve transit services, unfairly affecting areas with poor transit access. Increased demand could strain existing services, making it harder for those who rely on public transit the most to get where they need to go. This undermines the reading's claim that free public transportation would create a more inclusive society.

Rater's Comment

This response deserves a high score because it effectively summarizes the main points from both the reading and the lecture, clearly highlighting how the lecture challenges the reading. The response is well-organized, with each paragraph addressing a specific point of contention between the reading and the lecture. For instance, the first paragraph discusses the financial burden, the second addresses environmental concerns, and the third focuses on social fairness. The language used is clear and concise, with appropriate transitions that enhance the coherence of the essay. Phrases like "This contradicts the reading's claim" and "This challenges the reading's assertion" effectively signal the relationship between the reading and the lecture. Additionally, the response avoids personal opinions and maintains an objective tone, which is crucial for this type of task. Overall, the response demonstrates strong control over grammar, sentence structure, and vocabulary, with only minor errors that do not affect meaning.

Mid Level Response

The lecture disagrees with the reading about the benefits of free public transportation. The professor says that the cost of maintaining and operating public transit systems is high. Without fare income, cities might need to raise taxes, which could be a burden on residents, especially those who do not use public transportation. This goes against the reading's idea that free public transportation would be beneficial for all.

The professor also says that the environmental benefits are not guaranteed. If public transportation becomes overcrowded, it could lead to a decline in service quality. People might go back to using their cars if they find public transit inconsistent or uncomfortable, canceling out any potential environmental gains. Also, more use could damage transit systems, increasing maintenance costs and causing more service problems. This challenges the reading's claim that free public transportation would improve air quality and health.

Lastly, the professor talks about the complexities of social fairness. While free public transportation could help low-income individuals, it might also lead to unintended consequences. Without fare income, there might be less money to improve transit services, unfairly affecting areas with poor transit access. Increased demand could strain existing services, making it harder for those who rely on public transit the most to get where they need to go. This undermines the reading's claim that free public transportation would create a more inclusive society.

Rater's Comment

This response is adequate but has some limitations that prevent it from receiving a higher score. While it summarizes the main points from both the reading and the lecture, it lacks depth and detail. For example, the explanation of why free public transportation might not be beneficial for all is brief and could be expanded to provide a clearer understanding. Additionally, the response has some grammatical errors, such as "This goes against the reading's idea that free public transportation would be beneficial for all," which could be more clearly phrased. The organization is generally good, with each paragraph addressing a specific point, but the transitions between ideas are somewhat abrupt. Phrases like "This goes against the reading's idea" and "This challenges the reading's claim" are used effectively to show the relationship between the reading and the lecture, but the overall coherence could be improved. The response also maintains an objective tone and avoids personal opinions, which is appropriate for this task. However, the grammatical errors and lack of detail indicate that the response could be more polished and comprehensive.

Strategies for Taking the Integrated Writing Task on Should Public Transportation Be Free

Here are the strategies for taking the Integrated Writing Task on Should Public Transportation Be Free.

  • Read the passage carefully, taking concise notes on key points.
  • Listen actively to the lecture, noting its relationship to the reading.
  • Begin your response by clearly stating how the lecture relates to the reading.
  • Explain any contradictions or connections between the reading and lecture.
  • Integrate information from both sources throughout your essay.
  • Use clear transitions and attributions for information from each source.

Prepared to enhance your TOEFL writing skills? Our collection of example responses and professional tips is here to support you in your journey. It's time to put your abilities to the test with some hands-on practice!

Additional Reads:

 

Featured Articles

article
Should Prisons Focus on Rehabilitation Over Punishment - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

Prepare for the TOEFL Writing Integrated Section with a practice test on 'Should Prisons Focus on Rehabilitation Over Punishment' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam.

September 20, 2024
article
Should Public Transportation Be Free - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

Ace the TOEFL Writing integrated with the practice test on the topic ‘Should Public Transportation Be Free’ and improve your writing skills to ace the TOEFL test!

September 20, 2024
article
Should the Government Fund the Arts - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

Prepare for TOEFL exam with the Writing Integrated Test on 'Should the Government Fund the Arts'. Enhance your comprehension skills and get familiarised with the format.

September 20, 2024
article
Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to 16 - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

Prepare for TOEFL exam with the Writing Integrated Test on 'Should the Voting Age Be Lowered to 16'. Enhance your comprehension skills and get familiarised with the format.

September 20, 2024