logo
Contact us
zoom image
Home Practice Tests TOEFL Writing Practice Tests

The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarization - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test

alt image

"Prepare for the TOEFL Writing Integrated Section with a practice test on 'The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarization' and learn the skills to improve score in the TOEFL exam."

The TOEFL iBT®exam evaluates candidates on various abilities, placing particular importance on their communication skills. Among the test sections, the Writing Section is particularly significant, requiring diverse skills from TOEFL examinees.

With this practice test on 'The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation', it aims to enhance your writing abilities, concentrating specifically on the Integrated Writing task of the TOEFL test. It aims to assist you in understanding task instructions, structuring responses effectively, and enhancing your performance in the TOEFL Writing segment. So, let's start your journey towards attaining your desired TOEFL score!

Writing Instructions

  • You'll read a passage and listen to a lecture on an academic topic.
  • You may take notes while listening to aid comprehension.
  • Then you will write a response to a question that asks you about the lecture you heard. 
  • Answer the question comprehensively using information from the lecture. Avoid expressing personal opinions in the response.
  • There is no strict word limit. However, an effective response is considered to be within 150 to 225 words.
  • Your response will be assessed based on writing quality, content accuracy, and completeness.

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation

Social media has become a powerful force in shaping political conversation, and its impact on political division is a topic of significant concern. One of the main ways social media contributes to division is through the creation of echo chambers. Algorithms on platforms like Facebook and Twitter prioritize content that aligns with users' existing beliefs, reinforcing their views and isolating them from opposing perspectives. This can lead to a more divided and fragmented group of voters.

Another factor is the spread of misinformation and fake news. Social media allows for the rapid spread of information, but not all of it is accurate. False or misleading information can spread quickly, influencing public opinion and deepening political divides. Studies have shown that misinformation is more likely to be shared within like-minded groups, further deepening polarized views. Social media also increases extreme voices. The nature of these platforms often rewards sensational and provocative content, which can gain more visibility and engagement than moderate or detailed viewpoints. This can skew public perception, making extreme positions seem more common and acceptable, thereby increasing division.

Also, social media can contribute to the loss of trust in traditional media and institutions. As people increasingly rely on social media for news and information, they may become more skeptical of mainstream media and official sources. This distrust can lead to a reliance on partisan or biased sources, which can further polarize public opinion and weaken democratic processes.

Now play the Audio.

Question

Summarise on the lecture's main ideas and describe the various claims made in the reading passage by highlighting it.

 Response Time: 20 minutes 

Transcript of the Audio of the Lecture on ‘The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation’

Professor: While social media is often blamed for increasing political division, it's important to consider other factors that contribute to this issue. One major point is that political division has been growing for decades, long before social media appeared. Factors such as economic inequality, cultural shifts, and changes in the media landscape have all played significant roles in deepening political divides. Also, social media can serve as a platform for dialogue and understanding. It allows people from diverse backgrounds to share their views and engage in discussions that might not happen otherwise. When used responsibly, social media can help positive conversations and help bridge divides rather than widen them.

Another part to consider is the role of traditional media in division. Cable news networks and talk radio often present highly partisan viewpoints, which can influence public opinion just as much, if not more, than social media. The focus on exaggeration and conflict in traditional media can contribute to a divided political climate. Finally, the impact of social media on division can vary depending on how individuals use these platforms. Some people actively seek out diverse views and engage in meaningful discussions, while others may only follow like-minded individuals. The responsibility lies not just with the platforms but also with the users to seek out balanced information and engage in respectful dialogue.

Sample Responses for the Integrated Writing Task on ‘The Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation’

This section provides a thorough evaluation of various responses, including both High-level and Mid-level answers. Through a detailed review of these responses, you can identify areas that need improvement to attain your target score in the TOEFL.

High-Level Response 

The reading passage argues that social media contributes significantly to political division through the creation of echo chambers, the spread of misinformation, the amplification of extreme voices, and the erosion of trust in traditional media. However, the lecture presents several counterarguments that challenge these points. The lecture argues that political division has been growing for decades, long before the advent of social media. Factors such as economic inequality, cultural shifts, and changes in the media landscape have all played significant roles in deepening political divides. This contradicts the reading's claim that social media is a primary driver of political division.

Regarding dialogue and understanding, the lecture points out that social media can serve as a platform for positive conversations. It allows people from diverse backgrounds to share their views and engage in discussions that might not happen otherwise. When used responsibly, social media can help bridge divides rather than widen them. This counters the reading's assertion that social media primarily creates echo chambers. The lecture also highlights the role of traditional media in political division. Cable news networks and talk radio often present highly partisan viewpoints, which can influence public opinion just as much, if not more, than social media. The focus on exaggeration and conflict in traditional media can contribute to a divided political climate. This opposes the reading's view that social media is the main factor in increasing political division.

Lastly, the lecture addresses the responsibility of individuals in using social media. Some people actively seek out diverse views and engage in meaningful discussions, while others may only follow like-minded individuals. The responsibility lies not just with the platforms but also with the users to seek out balanced information and engage in respectful dialogue. This challenges the reading's claim that social media inherently leads to political division.

To conclude, while the reading passage emphasizes the negative impact of social media on political division, the lecture provides compelling reasons to consider other factors and the potential for social media to foster positive dialogue, focusing on issues of historical context, the role of traditional media, and individual responsibility.

Rater’s Comment 

This response deserves a high score as it effectively summarizes the main points from both the reading and the lecture, demonstrating a clear understanding of the material. The essay is well-organized, with each paragraph addressing a specific point of contention between the reading and the lecture. For instance, the response clearly contrasts the reading's claim about social media being a primary driver of political division with the lecture's argument on historical factors. Similarly, it juxtaposes the reading's view on echo chambers with the lecture's points on positive dialogue.

The response also maintains objectivity, focusing on summarizing the relationship between the reading and the lecture without expressing personal opinions. The use of transitions such as "The lecture argues," "Regarding dialogue and understanding," and "Lastly, the lecture addresses" helps to clearly signal the relationship between the two sources, enhancing the coherence and flow of the essay. Moreover, the language used is appropriate for a college-level response, with strong control over grammar, sentence structure, and vocabulary. The essay is concise, staying within the word limit while effectively conveying all necessary information. Overall, the response demonstrates a high level of proficiency in summarizing and synthesizing information from multiple sources, which is a key requirement for this task.

Mid-Level Response 

The reading passage argues that social media contributes significantly to political division through the creation of echo chambers, the spread of misinformation, the amplification of extreme voices, and the erosion of trust in traditional media. But the lecture presents several counterarguments that challenge these points. The lecture argues that political division has been growing for decades, long before the advent of social media. Factors such as economic inequality, cultural shifts, and changes in the media landscape have all played significant roles in deepening political divides. This contradicts the reading's claim that social media is a primary driver of political division.

Also, the lecture points out that social media can serve as a platform for positive conversations. It allows people from diverse backgrounds to share their views and engage in discussions that might not happen otherwise. When used responsibly, social media can help bridge divides rather than widen them. This counters the reading's assertion that social media primarily creates echo chambers. The lecture also highlights the role of traditional media in political division. Cable news networks and talk radio often present highly partisan viewpoints, which can influence public opinion just as much, if not more, than social media. The focus on exaggeration and conflict in traditional media can contribute to a divided political climate. This opposes the reading's view that social media is the main factor in increasing political division.

Rater’s Comment 

This response provides a summary of the main points from both the reading and the lecture, but it lacks some depth and detail, which is why it falls into the mid-level category. The essay is generally well-organized, with each paragraph addressing a specific point of contention between the reading and the lecture. However, it omits some important details and examples that would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the material. For instance, the response mentions the lecture's point about the high initial investment and ongoing costs of digital services but does not elaborate on the specific expenses like regular updates and maintenance. Similarly, while it notes the lecture's concern about the traditional role of libraries, it does not fully explain how shifting to digital services might weaken the sense of community.

The response also contains a few grammatical errors and awkward phrasings, such as "Many people, especially in low-income areas, might not have reliable internet or the devices needed to use digital services." A more polished sentence would be, "Many people, particularly in low-income areas, may lack reliable internet access or the necessary devices to utilize digital services." Overall, while the response demonstrates a basic understanding of the material and is generally coherent, it lacks the depth, detail, and language control required for a higher score.

Strategies for Taking the Integrated Writing Task on the Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation

Here are the strategies for taking the Integrated Writing Task on the Impact of Social Media on Political Polarisation :

    • Read the passage carefully, taking concise notes on key points.
    • Listen actively to the lecture, and evaluate its relationship to the reading.
    • Begin your response by clearly stating how the lecture relates to the reading.
    • Explain any contradictions or connections between the reading and lecture.
    • Incorporate the given information from both sources throughout your essay.
    • Use clear transitions for information from each source to make a point.

Additional Reads:

Featured Articles

article
Discussing Course Prerequisites with an Advisor - TOEFL Listening Practice Test

Prepare for the TOEFL Listening Section with a practice test on 'Discussing Course Prerequisites with an Advisor' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam.

November 19, 2024
article
Discussing Dining Hall Meal Plans - TOEFL Listening Practice Test

Prepare for the TOEFL Listening Section with a practice test on 'Discussing Dining Hall Meal Plans' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam.

November 19, 2024
article
Discussing Dormitory Roommate Issues with a Resident Advisor - TOEFL Listening Practice Test

Prepare for the TOEFL Listening Section with a practice test on 'Discussing Dormitory Roommate Issues with a Resident Advisor' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam.

November 19, 2024
article
Discussing Graduate School Applications with a Mentor - TOEFL Listening Practice Test

Prepare for the TOEFL Listening Section with a practice test on 'Discussing Graduate School Applications with a Mentor' and learn the skills to improve your score in the TOEFL exam.

November 19, 2024