The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime - TOEFL iBT® Writing Integrated Practice Test

In this TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test on 'The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime', you'll analyze both a reading passage and a lecture. The task requires you to summarize the lecture’s key points and compare them with the reading.

This practice will help you master the integrated writing task, where you must synthesize information from multiple sources. Sharpen your skills to effectively structure your response and succeed in the TOEFL Writing iBT section.

Writing Instructions 

• You'll read a passage and listen to a lecture on an academic topic.
• You may take notes while listening to aid comprehension.
• Then you will write a response to a question that asks you about the lecture you heard.
• Answer the question comprehensively using information from the lecture. Avoid expressing personal opinions in the response.
• There is no strict word limit. However, an effective response is considered to be within 150 to 225 words.
• Your response will be assessed based on writing quality, content accuracy, and completeness.

The media has a big impact on how people see crime, often leading to misunderstandings about how common crime really is and what kinds of crimes are happening. One major way the media affects public perception is by showing more violent crimes than other types. News outlets often focus on stories about murders, assaults, and other violent acts because these stories get more attention from viewers and readers. This focus makes it seem like violent crime is more common than it really is, causing unnecessary fear and worry among the public.

Another way the media distorts public perception is by making crime stories seem more dramatic than they are. This involves blowing up the details of a crime to make it seem more shocking. This approach grabs attention and leaves a lasting impression, making people think such extreme cases happen often. For example, high-profile cases involving celebrities or very shocking crimes get a lot of coverage, leading people to believe these incidents are typical rather than rare.Moreover, the media often doesn't provide context or follow-up information about crime statistics and trends. Reports on crime spikes or specific incidents rarely come with data showing long-term trends or comparisons with other areas. This lack of context stops the public from understanding the bigger picture, like whether crime rates are actually going up or if a particular incident is unusual. Because of this, people may develop an exaggerated sense of danger and mistrust in their communities.

Lastly, the media's portrayal of certain groups as more likely to commit crimes can reinforce harmful stereotypes and biases. For instance, minority communities are often shown as being more involved in criminal activities, which can lead to unfair labeling and discrimination. This biased representation not only affects public perception but also influences policy decisions and law enforcement practices, continuing a cycle of inequality and injustice.

Now play the audio.

Question 

Present a short overview of the lecture’s main points, focusing on how they align with or dispute the reading passage’s assertions.

Transcript of the Audio of the Lecture on The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime

Sample Responses for the Integrated Writing Task on The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime

The following analysis offers insights into various response levels, from mid-level to high-level, highlighting key areas for enhancement to help you achieve your target score:

Mid-Level Response:

The reading passage argues that the media makes people think crime is more common and violent than it is by focusing on violent crimes and dramatizing stories. It says this causes unnecessary fear and reinforces stereotypes, especially about minority groups. The passage also claims that the media doesn’t give enough context about crime trends, which leads to misunderstanding.

The lecture agrees that the media has a big impact on how people see crime but offers some counterarguments. It says that focusing on violent crimes can raise awareness about serious issues like domestic violence, leading to public discussions and policy changes. The lecture also points out that not all media outlets dramatize stories, and some accurate reporting can help the public. Lastly, it mentions that investigative journalism gives more context about crime trends and that media coverage has sparked important conversations about issues like racial profiling, leading to positive societal changes. (150 Words)

Rater's Comment:

This response covers the key points from both the reading and lecture, but lacks some depth. There are some grammatical issues, such as "the media makes people think crime is more common," which could be rephrased for clarity. The transitions between ideas are somewhat basic, making the overall flow less smooth. Adding more precise examples or further elaboration on key points from the lecture would strengthen the response. The essay still meets the requirements for a mid-level score, showing an understanding of the content, but there is room for improvement in clarity and cohesiveness. Improved sentence structure and more effective use of transitional phrases would elevate the quality of the writing.

High-Level Response:

The reading passage argues that the media distorts public perception of crime by emphasizing violent crimes, dramatizing stories, lacking context, and reinforcing stereotypes. In contrast, the lecture offers counterarguments to these claims.

The lecture acknowledges that violent crimes are often highlighted but suggests this can raise awareness about serious issues like domestic violence, leading to policy changes. This counters the reading’s assertion that such focus only induces fear. Regarding dramatization, the lecture notes that not all media outlets exaggerate; reputable sources aim for accuracy, and dramatic stories can sometimes prompt necessary public action. The lecture also challenges the reading’s claim about the lack of context, explaining that investigative journalism and in-depth analyses often provide a fuller picture of crime trends. Finally, while the reading argues that media reinforces stereotypes, the lecture highlights how coverage of racial profiling and systemic bias has sparked important discussions and reforms.

In summary, the lecture provides a nuanced view, highlighting how media coverage can contribute positively to public understanding and societal change.(167 Words)

Rater's Comment:

This response effectively summarizes the reading and lecture, presenting a clear and balanced view. The structure is logical, with each paragraph focusing on specific points and counterpoints. The response demonstrates strong control over grammar and vocabulary, with no noticeable errors. Transitions between points are smooth, and the use of paraphrasing shows a good grasp of the material. The response maintains objectivity and clarity, fully addressing the task requirements. To achieve a perfect score, the writer might add a bit more detail on how the lecture’s counterpoints specifically address the reading’s claims, but overall, the response is well-crafted and demonstrates high-level writing skills.

Strategies for Taking the Integrated Writing Task on The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime

Here are some strategies for approaching the TOEFL Integrated Writing Task on 'The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime':

1. Understand Both Sources Clearly: Start by carefully reading the passage and listening to the lecture. Take detailed notes on the key points from each source. This step is essential for grasping how they relate to one another.

2. Focus on Key Points: In your response, highlight the main arguments from both the reading and the lecture. Emphasize how the lecture either supports or contradicts the claims made in the reading about the media's effect on public perception of crime.

3. Organize Your Response: Structure your essay in a clear manner. Begin with a brief introduction that summarizes both the reading and the lecture. Then, discuss how the lecture’s viewpoints align with or challenge the reading.

4. Conclude with a summary : Summary that reflects how the lecture addresses the assertions made in the reading.

5. Use Accurate Examples: Include specific examples from both the reading and the lecture. For instance, if the reading mentions that media tends to exaggerate crime for sensationalism, point out how the lecture counters this by explaining that some media outlets prioritize accurate reporting.

6. Keep it Clear and Concise: Strive for clarity in your writing. Avoid unnecessary details and ensure your response effectively compares and contrasts the reading and the lecture.

Hope this practice test on 'The Influence of Media on Public Perception of Crime' helps you refine your skills in integrating and comparing information from different sources. Keep practicing to enhance your ability to summarize and analyze effectively for the TOEFL Writing section.

Also Read: 

• Group Of People- TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test
• Pluto - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test with Answer
• Solar Energy - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test
• Speaking Through Social Media - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test
• The Role of Volunteerism in Community Development - TOEFL Writing Integrated Practice Test